I was under the impression that the events of the film were supposed to be true, however after viewing the film I have to assume that the narrative most likely isn’t true.  The film even begins by giving an amusing text that says, “More of this is true than you would believe.”  Maybe because of or in spite of the opening text I found myself forgetting that some of the facts were actually supposed to be facts and not just insanity.  I don’t actually know whether or not anything is based on fact in the film.  I wouldn’t be surprised if the film and the book it was based on were to be outted as entirely fictional.  However, the writer stands by his statements that his book is based on factual events.  This didn’t take away from the fun or intelligently constructed images which made the film worth seeing.

For the most part, the movie takes no political stance.  The plot follows a reporter who by happenstance is thrust into the world of the government agency called the First Earth Battalion.  This agency’s main goal is to produce “warrior monks” who achieve psychic/psionic super powers through new age methods with the intent of non-lethal application.  It’s hilarious in concept and practice.  Hippies are held up as the perfect example of insanity.  Their ideals led them to a place of utter ridiculous belief and ultimately to the belief in their own superpowers.  The film also offers another object of ridicule.  A former First Earth Battalion member, Lynn Cassady (George Clooney), and the reporter, Bob Wilton (Ewan McGreggor), travel into Iraq in order to complete a mission.  There they eventually mean some gun toting Americans who fire on another group of gun toting Americans.  Usually I would be irritated by such blatant representation of the American soldier as ignorant gun-nuts, but earlier in the film they give a more sympathetic and realistic portrayal of (non-hippie) soldiers.  It all serves to show that Average Joes have the capability of compassion and strength while others, specifically hippies and gun-nuts, are on the cusp of insanity. 

The film tries to align itself more toward the hippie’s ideals by showing that the superpowers are a reasonable endeavor.  Midway through the film Cassady displays psychic powers by correctly identifying the locations of lost persons, and other feats of remote viewing.  My initial reaction after viewing the ending of the film was that The Men Who Stare At Goats was trying to fall into the long line of liberally slanted films.  However, upon further analysis, I find that the only thing this movie truly promotes is the ability of achieving superhuman abilities, which could be symbolically interpreted as the ultimate realization of the self and finding inner peace.  The hippie stuff is still idealistic, and potentially dangerous despite poeticism.  I could use evidence from the film to support my claims, but I would rather not ruin the humor of those scenes. 

Even though clever dialogue is important, being able to say a lot without words is just as important.  The Men Who Stare At Goats is written in such a way that allows for he image to speak for itself.

Ironically, this film has a voice over by Wilton.  A voice over is only necessary if it brings something to the audience that couldn’t have been given any other way.  The major reason this movie used a voice over was to make the transition from novel to screen more natural.  I don’t know that it was absolutely necessary, but I was pleased with it.  Even in films that use a voice over well, like Zombieland, the voice over itself can be stereotyped in tone.  Maybe the voice over in The Men Who Stare At Goats falls into stereotype, but it’s been a while since I’ve heard this type of voice over.  Wilton is utterly convinced that he experienced something magnificent.  He’s convinced not only that he was on a worthwhile adventure, but that the adventure was more spiritually epic than he had imagined possible.  The reason this worked is because Wilton is able to develop his character through his experience with the insanity that is Lynn Cassady.  Wilton ends the film with personal revelations that are explicitly stated in the voice over, but he doesn’t dwell on how he came to those conclusions.  This film understands that the audience has already seen the film and they don’t need to flog us with themes. Personally, I think a theme should be left unstated so that after the film the audience has something to talk about other than, “Man that was funny,” or, “That explosion was cool.”

The Verdict:  I’m giving The Men Who Stare At Goats a 4 out of 5.  It’s funny.  Plain and simple: it’s a good time. At times there may not have been the proper build to certain plot points, but those are few and far between.  The movie’s biggest downfall is that it’s obvious that it’s trying to turn a novel into a movie.  Ultimately I don’t care.  This movie has enough unspoken thought behind it that it’s worth watching again.

-Vince

I entered the theater fully expecting to see a movie doing nothing more than catering to an audience’s sense of nostalgia.  That’s exactly what it was, but it still managed to be fun.  It’s ridiculous, but solid.  Most importantly, you don’t need to be a fan of the cartoon or the comics to appreciate the movie; however having some knowledge does help you understand the corny references.  I won’t complain about the lack of intellectualism because it’s a movie based on toys.  If you actually expect to see something more than a plot line that’s an engine to produce violence, then you’ve obviously never played with toys.

My assessment of G.I. Joe as a mental property is that it’s a hectic jumble of a massive assortment of characters.  I thought there was no way that the movie could tie them together in an orderly fashion.  The end result was a fairly successful mixture of action genres, most noticeably war and martial arts.  I believe there were elements of the western genre, but I could be wrong considering that many elements of western are often present in both war and martial arts films.  In fact westerns are considered a close relative of martial arts films.  John Sturges’ The Magnificent Seven (1960) is a western remake of Akira Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai (1954), and Eastwood’s A Fist Full of Dollars (1964) is a remake of Kurosawa’s Yojimbo (1961).  So it could be said that I’m imagining things because Duke and Ripcord are referred to as cowboys, but due to the stand off gun battles I think they managed to incorporate the western genre.  Just in case you’re wondering, I am aware that I’m over thinking a mindless action flick.

Since there are so many characters the major problem was how any of their backgrounds would be given to the audience.  The filmmakers had to decide whose background was ultimately unnecessary, and who could be tied into another character in order to use flashback scenes economically.  The Baroness and Duke are paired together, and Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow have common history.  I don’t know if any of their backgrounds remain true to the comics or the cartoons, but I don’t much care considering it’s all based on Hasbro’s toy line anyway.

The action was over the top almost to the point of camp, but the film managed to keep a sense a sense of physics.  The choreography and camera work of all battles whether they were car, submarine, aircraft, gun, or hand-to-hand battles were perfectly complimentary to their respective genres. 

My major complaint (other than the lack of intellectualism) is that Channing Tatum was cast as Duke.  He’s photographable and looks rough enough to be a soldier.  Tatum is capable of showing three emotions: serious, mildly happy, and yelling.  The obvious counter argument is that Duke is a soldier who shouldn’t show much emotion.  Since the emotional pull is so sparse, why weigh what little pull exists on the shoulders of an actor who has proven in the past that he’s incapable of being more than a rough, pretty boy.  He was out acted by Ray Park, whose character, Snake Eyes, took a vow of silence, and held to it throughout the entire movie.  Come to think of it, most of the acting was pretty bad, but Tatum was exceptionally bad.

The most entertaining aspect of the film is that it seemed like a kid playing with his toys.  The gadgets they use are fitting of the scene then they are discarded because they served their purpose.  It’s like the movie tried to replicate the logic that the Batman toy creators use.  *Batman now featured with detachable Dalmatian fire dog Armor complete with Ion-cannon!*  The acceleration armor that Duke and Ripcord use is silly in concept, but considering that the movie is based around super science and nano-bots,  the ridiculousness of concepts like that becomes easily acceptable.

The Verdict:  G.I. Joe is a perfect example of a fun movie.  My opinion is that it’s worth seeing, especially if you’re stressed out for some reason.  Take the kids as long as they don’t mind a surprising amount of death, and some PG-13 language.

-Vince