Star Trek: What Do You Think of Going Back To The Beginning?
Saturday, March 14th, 2009To be honest, it would be nice to see the forces that shaped the life of James T. Kirk before we met him.
And it would be also be nice to see all the characters young, fresh out of the academy, with all the idealism and energy that comes at the beginning of a career.
But I think that it is also pretty short-sighted of Paramount to not do movies of the other franchises, especially right after they ended, when fan interest and emotion was at its highest. [Not to mention, all the actors were still available!]
The most obvious example of this is Deep Space Nine; what happens to Sisko? Does Odo ever come back from the Founders’ Planet? Does the Federation go on to explore more of the Gamma Quadrant… ?
You get the picture. At least a few of these questions could have been answered by *one* movie!
:sighs heavily:
Ok. I’ll stop ranting. It is disappointing to see that the producers are going for the quick buck, when there is a virtual gold mine of ideas and loose threads that can be developed into good movies that even non-fans would enjoy.
Am I wrong? Should we go back and explore Kirk’s life and times? Should we go forward, and continue with the adventures of the Titan, or should we just create a new, movie-only crew from one of the [non-canon] books in the Star Trek print universe?
