The Haunting in Connecticut Review
Tuesday, March 31st, 2009
I entered the theater with hopes about as low as the devil’s hooves. Judging from the advertising campaign, I assumed the movie was desperately trying to sell something that was less than it claimed to be. So that being said, I enjoyed the movie.
The characters were good people, which is a rarity in modern cinema. The movie collectively takes time to make the people kind and considerate. By virtue of that aspect, I enjoyed the film. I found it refreshing. The incredible acts of selflessness provide an escape in these times of turmoil. However, the movie tries too hard to make the characters “nice.” It gets a little sickening. It doesn’t seem real, but, then again, we live in a society that’s more than ready to claim dysfunction in any social arrangement. The dysfunction is added into the movie via the father of the family Peter Campbell (Martin Donovan). He’s a recovered drunk and liar. This feeds the theme of the movie, but doesn’t add to the plot. Theme aside, the father subplot was mostly useless. He spends a little time deciding whether or not to drink. Then the inevitable happens with remarkably slight result.

The theme is very obviously the power and potential of redemption. Religion even plays a strong role. The characters, both living and dead, have a chance to redeem themselves. I can’t say much more because it because it would ruin the most enjoyable aspects of the movie.
The style of the movie is a cross between The Ammityville Horror and The Exorcist. Some not too subtle references are made with the composition of the shots used. The house was very close to the one in Ammityville, and the use of Reverend Popescu (Elias Koteas) is directly from The Exorcist.
The scares featured are a mix of creative and stereotyped. It toys with your mind a little, but mostly it relies on the scares that you’ve seen in every horror film: a person who isn’t there/reflections/shadows/etc. The creativity may not be “well worth the wait.” But it was paced adequately.

The plot was ultimately unimpressive. It was formulaic, and predictable. For a horror movie that relies so heavily on making the audience jump, the director Peter Cornwell doesn’t really try to surprise the audience with the script’s formulaic misdirection efforts. The formula only works if the surprise is effective.
Some of the dialogue was stale. Under the stress from her teenage son’s cancer, Sara Campbell (Virginia Madsen) says “Please God don’t take my, baby,” or something to that effect. When a person’s child is dying, they can’t help, but say corny lines. Those lines don’t need to be in the movie. They only serve to tell the audience what we already know.
Possibly unintentional, but still interesting was the small parallel drawn between experimental science, and religion. The boy with cancer Matt Campbell (Kyle Gallner) is chosen for an experimental treatment at the same time that he starts experiencing the haunting. It was used mainly as a plot device, but the correlation is interesting none the less.

Lastly I feel I should mention Reverend Popescu (Elias Koteas) I was completely unaware that Koteas would be in the movie, and he plays a significant role. Looking as his imdb page shows that he has far from fallen off the movie industry radar. Regardless, it’s a treat to see him acting in anything. Whether it’s The Prophecy or Ninja Turtles 3.
The Verdict: It may not be the best movie, or even the most creative. The main attraction of the film is its human qualities in the midst of the supernatural. It’s a movie that poses a strong argument for the strength of man kind in the face of human corruption. So, whether you choose to think of it as escapist fiction, or a realistic positive message, the movie provides a sense of hope in a time that people might need it. My recommendation is to see the film.










