<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek: The Three Timeline Theory Part III</title>
	<link>http://blog.mygeeklife.net/articles/2008/01/25/star-trek-the-three-timeline-theory-part-iii/</link>
	<description>Tech, Games, Sci-Fi, and more!!</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Capt Logan</title>
		<link>http://blog.mygeeklife.net/articles/2008/01/25/star-trek-the-three-timeline-theory-part-iii/#comment-1132</link>
		<dc:creator>Capt Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mygeeklife.net/articles/2008/01/25/star-trek-the-three-timeline-theory-part-iii/#comment-1132</guid>
		<description>pilotsim:

I plan on it. I'm a little afraid it's going to be such a reboot there won't be any clever way to build it in besides just copping out with "it's just a fourth timeline." But I still think there's a chance that even though Abrams is rebooting, it'll be a reboot that comes out of original continuity (with old, 24th century Spock traveling back in time and changing things). And if that happens, it may very well just be a new timeline that wipes out everything else. But it might not mesh with the Enterprise stuff-- I guess we'll just have to wait and see!

Really glad you enjoyed the articles. LLAP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pilotsim:</p>
<p>I plan on it. I&#8217;m a little afraid it&#8217;s going to be such a reboot there won&#8217;t be any clever way to build it in besides just copping out with &#8220;it&#8217;s just a fourth timeline.&#8221; But I still think there&#8217;s a chance that even though Abrams is rebooting, it&#8217;ll be a reboot that comes out of original continuity (with old, 24th century Spock traveling back in time and changing things). And if that happens, it may very well just be a new timeline that wipes out everything else. But it might not mesh with the Enterprise stuff&#8211; I guess we&#8217;ll just have to wait and see!</p>
<p>Really glad you enjoyed the articles. LLAP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pilotsim</title>
		<link>http://blog.mygeeklife.net/articles/2008/01/25/star-trek-the-three-timeline-theory-part-iii/#comment-1131</link>
		<dc:creator>pilotsim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 01:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mygeeklife.net/articles/2008/01/25/star-trek-the-three-timeline-theory-part-iii/#comment-1131</guid>
		<description>Wow, that makes so much sense, I had kind of come to the same conclusions but you laid them out so well.  Now you just have to blog about what the new Star Trek film does to the cannon once it comes out and we all see it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that makes so much sense, I had kind of come to the same conclusions but you laid them out so well.  Now you just have to blog about what the new Star Trek film does to the cannon once it comes out and we all see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heyes</title>
		<link>http://blog.mygeeklife.net/articles/2008/01/25/star-trek-the-three-timeline-theory-part-iii/#comment-977</link>
		<dc:creator>Heyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.mygeeklife.net/articles/2008/01/25/star-trek-the-three-timeline-theory-part-iii/#comment-977</guid>
		<description>Awesome! Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome! Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
